首先確定目標,假設是:www.XXX.com
先讓俺看看是不是連得上:
以下是引用片段: C:ping www.XXX.com Pinging www.XXX.com[202.106.184.200] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.106.184.200: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=244 Reply from 202.106.184.200: bytes=32 time=620ms TTL=244 Reply from 202.106.184.200: bytes=32 time=651ms TTL=244 Reply from 202.106.184.200: bytes=32 time=511ms TTL=244 Ping statistics for 202.106.184.200: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 511ms, Maximum = 651ms, Average = 580ms 嘻嘻—不但連得上,速度還不錯…… 先telnet看看banner: C:>telnet www.XXX.com
再試試ftp,
以下是引用片段: C:>ftp www.XXX.com Connected to www.fbi.gov.tw. 220 XXX-www FTP server (Version wu-2.6.1(1) Wed Aug 9 05:54:50 EDT 2000) ready. User (www.XXX.com:(none)):
以下是引用片段: C:>telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness) Kernel 2.2.16-22smp on an i686 login: fetdog Password: bash-2.04$
以下是引用片段: bash-2.04$nmap -sT -O www.XXX.com Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA7 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) WARNING! The following files exist and are readable: /usr/local/sha -services and ./nmap-services. I am choosing /usr/local/share/nmap/ s for security reasons. set NMAPDIR=. to give priority to files in irectory Interesting ports on (www.XXX.com): (The 1520 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed) Port State Service 25/tcp open smtp 79/tcp open finger 80/tcp open http 111/tcp open sunrpc 113/tcp open auth 443/tcp open https 513/tcp open login 514/tcp open shell 515/tcp open printer 587/tcp open submission 1024/tcp open kdm TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=random positive increments Difficulty=3247917 (Good luck!) Remote operating system guess: Linux 2.1.122 - 2.2.16 Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 9 seconds
打開的端口還挺多,這意味著入侵的可能性增加。79/tcp open finger ,先看看這個,不過linux沒有finger用戶列表這個漏洞。